Word on the Street: Will the Communities Have A Say in the Trust?

Rumour: "Communities won't have control of the Trust funds."

Each community has direct access to their share of the funds. The Trust would invest money collectively, and share the cost of administration. By working together, we will reduce the cost of administration and drastically increase returns on investment.

The trust was designed with very broad purposes so each community would have access to the funds to use on any project or activity that fits into the broad trust purposes such as education, culture, job creation, services and buildings. Each community will have direct and unhindered access to their share of the monies. Chief and Council are ineligible to be trustees.

  • Each participating community receives money from the trust and may use these monies for a broad range of trust purposes that benefit their community.
  • Each community will appoint a trustee to govern the trust who is not a chief or councillor.
  • Each community must select a trustee (by vote or by appointment, for example).
  • Trustees will be traineed to do all the work required.
  • An administrative trustee, an expert in trust administration, will be appointed to assist and oversee the management of the trust.
  • The administrative trustee will be responsible for regular reporting to the communities and the SCC.
  • An investment manager will be selected by the trust to invest the money.

Bottom Line: Communities will have direct and unhindered access to their share of the Trust Funds. The funds need to be used for the trust purposes, which are designed to benefit the whole community including off-reserve members.


Be sure to check out the other "Word on the Street" posts: 

  1. Will the chief get a bonus on a ‘Yes’ vote?
    http://tinyurl.com/word-on-street1
  2. Will the communities have a say in the Trust? 
    http://tinyurl.com/word-on-street2
  3. Will members off-reserve benefit from this agreement? 
    http://tinyurl.com/word-on-street3
  4. Are we surrendering title and rights to our land?
    http://tinyurl.com/word-on-street4
  5. Can we reach a better deal in the courts?
    http://tinyurl.com/word-on-street5

    5 responses
    Why is the SCC involved?
    Hi Glenda,

    There are some nation programs that are administered by the SCC. The SCC will also take care of nation issues. The Chiefs already all meet monthly (sometime more often) to discuss nation issues and respond to them. This settlement would provide some nation programs that every community could access. I hope that helps, Mike Leach is the chairperson of the SCC and any specific questions can be directed to him or Stacey Austinson.

    The SCC *won't* be involved in any community issues, those will be left up to the community and their leadership.

    Jacob

    Just yesterday on tv or newspaper there is news that BC Hydro is under review or audit will this review or audit change or delete any agreements made prior to review-audit completion and reporting.
    Hi Gayle,

    The agreement has already been initialled by all parties and now needs to pass a vote from members to come into effect. Also, the agreement is guaranteed by the province of BC.

    This type of agreement - which is a settlement, and also puts in place a relationship agreement and water use plan - is very different from agreements that could be effected by a review or audit.

    Jacob

    I understand the agreement achieves certainty for BC Hydro in regards to any claims from existing facilities. For Tsalashmec, in particular, does this include potential emotional, spiritual, cultural land-based trauma due to the impact on our valley from the Hydro facilitites in our valley?

    Does the agreement take into account the economic losses from the damage to the Seton Lake salmon run?

    Kukstamckacw